This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Unfortunately for Photobucket users, things have changed in a big way as of June 26th they are rolling out a $399 per year subscription fee for those who want to hotlink images from Photobucket’s servers to display elsewhere.
    This does not mean it only affects this site, It now means that billions of images across the Web now display an error message instead of the image in question. :(
    https://barrreport.com/threads/attention-photobucket-users.14377/
    Dismiss Notice

Venturi Comparison

Discussion in 'General Plant Topics' started by jonathan11, Mar 27, 2005.

  1. jonathan11

    jonathan11 Lifetime Charter Member
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am now using Tom's venturi design furnished to me by one of the boards gracious members, that esteemed gentleman and fellow aquarist (feverish applause and loud clapping), Cornhusker. Works great!! My previous reactor was a Reactor 200, but it is not as good as Tom's design. My solenoid is not turning on and off as frequently as it did, even with a higher KH setting. Has anyone else had experience with this and how does your reactor compare? As well, I believe Cornhusker made some mods to the original design, so he might want to list the improvements. Sorry to put you on the spot, buddy.
     
  2. Cornhusker

    Cornhusker Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Venturi Comparison

    :( i seem to be treading on sacred ground with the reactor issue. so i'm out'a here.sorry. regards,cornhusker :( :(
     
  3. chubasco

    chubasco Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Venturi Comparison

    Now Cornhusker, I certainly hope you don't mean for good. Your cheerful
    posts would be sorely missed!

    Bill
     
  4. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator Social Group Admin

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,443
    Likes Received:
    302
    Re: Venturi Comparison

    cornhusker,

    I received the version you made.
    The venturi is a bit lower than need be and the burp hole is much higher than need be.

    You may wish to lower the pump input and place the venturi slightly above that and then place the burp hole at this same level or slightly lower.

    Placing the venturi hole below the pump input is a good idea though since you can directly feed the CO2 in to the pump's impellar with the pump mounted on the side.

    It tends to make less noise and seems smoother if there is a venturi on the pump's output, but nothing wrong with feeding it into the pump's intake either.

    There are a few modifications that could be done to any design, most are minor.

    The biggest issue here is the placement of the burp hole being too high.
    The CO2 will burp out before the CO2 gas bubble will ever reaching the low venturi level, it's almost 2 inches away and the pressure from the gas bubble will burp out the gas instead of building it.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
Loading...

Share This Page