Has anyone had success with using a stand-alone CO2 reactor in a sump? (versus returning the water to the tank directly)
I'm running a 40 gal sump beneath a 130 gal display tank, and I'm diffusing CO2 directly into the display tank using an Atomic ceramic diffuser. For purely aesthetic reasons, I'd like to remove the diffuser from the display tank. However, I have a large variable speed return pump that is hard-plumbed between the sump and the tank that I'd just as soon leave alone - so I'm not thrilled about the idea of inserting either an inline diffuser or CO2 reactor between the return pump and the tank.
Instead, I'd like to be able to install a stand-alone CO2 reactor in the sump. My idea is to use a dedicated pump to drive flow through the reactor and return the outflow back to the sump. My assumption is that if the CO2 is 100% dissolved in the reactor, and the reactor return is arranged in the same compartment in the sump as the return to the display tank, then I should be able to get CO2-laden water back to the display with little off-gassing.
I know there will be "some" off-gassing as the water passes through the pump and back into the display, but I'm assuming that this would still be more efficient than the in-tank diffuser I'm using now (I see lots of micro-bubbles in the display that make their way to the surface).
Am I thinking about this the right way?
I'm sure someone has tried this before ... can anyone share their experience?
I'm running a 40 gal sump beneath a 130 gal display tank, and I'm diffusing CO2 directly into the display tank using an Atomic ceramic diffuser. For purely aesthetic reasons, I'd like to remove the diffuser from the display tank. However, I have a large variable speed return pump that is hard-plumbed between the sump and the tank that I'd just as soon leave alone - so I'm not thrilled about the idea of inserting either an inline diffuser or CO2 reactor between the return pump and the tank.
Instead, I'd like to be able to install a stand-alone CO2 reactor in the sump. My idea is to use a dedicated pump to drive flow through the reactor and return the outflow back to the sump. My assumption is that if the CO2 is 100% dissolved in the reactor, and the reactor return is arranged in the same compartment in the sump as the return to the display tank, then I should be able to get CO2-laden water back to the display with little off-gassing.
I know there will be "some" off-gassing as the water passes through the pump and back into the display, but I'm assuming that this would still be more efficient than the in-tank diffuser I'm using now (I see lots of micro-bubbles in the display that make their way to the surface).
Am I thinking about this the right way?
I'm sure someone has tried this before ... can anyone share their experience?