The reason I subscribed

lisa_perry75

Junior Poster
Jun 3, 2007
3
0
1
Hi there,
I got a new tank (100 x 40 x 50 cm) and a pressurised Co2 unit and I would basically like some help in how to set it up! Assuming 10cm for gap at the top and substrate the tank holds 160L and 42US gallons.

I have spent alot of time on TFF and am now a member of the ukaps, so know a little bit. The plan was to do a Diana Walstead type approach, but then I found a cheap pressurised Co2 system and it kind of went out the window! Now I can't decide if I should go Ei, or do the low tech with pressurised Co2 route. I am a student and don't have much money, so am currently selling anything spare I have to afford the new tank. I like the idea of going Ei, spending a bit more time on the tank but managing to sell excess plants to make back a little bit of money. I just don't know if I could keep up with it when uni gets hectic. Plus what about when I go back for the weekend etc. I would like the high fish load Diana Walstead approach brings.

The tank I would like to aim for:-
Mainly 2-3mm gravel top substrate, a little sandy area for some corys, a dwarf hairgrass area, a dwarf four leaf clover area, some twiggy bogwood covererd in java moss and some pebbles dotted around. Fish wise I would like a cardinal shoal, galaxy rasbora shoal, a couple of rainbows, I have 2 4" plecos, apple snails, a red cherry shrimp population.

I am stuck what to do lighting, filtration and substrate wise.

Lighting wise - obviously depends on which route I'm taking. There are so many choices atm with T5 original, HO T5, T5 HO, T5 high-lite, PC, T6 or T8. Then I don't have a hood so if I get a luminaire variety should I get a cover glass to prevent evaporation and fish jumping out? If I don't get a luminaire type I have to make a hood. Which should I go for? A 2 x 39W luminaire would give 1.8 wpg maybe if I could get a 4 x 39W I could go Ei or low tech...

Filtration - I have a fluval 204 but I don't know if this is powerful enough considering I would like high fish load, maybe a 305?

Substrate - I would like to get one from the shop I used to work at as they would offer me discount. They have in stock:- seachem onyx gravel and sand, aquagroundclay, tetracompletesubstrate. I already have the sand and 2-3 mm gravel. I could get them to order in seachem fluorite or API laterite. Which substrate is best for long term fertilisation and what I want it for?

Water - my tap water is liquid chalk. The analysis is here:- http://www.portsmouthwater.co.uk/reports/POS%20WQ%20Summary_2006.pdf
Portsmouth South Zone
mg/l CaCO3 ppm CaCO3 282
Clarkes d English 19.7
German dH 15.8
French dF 28.2
mg/l Calcium 112.9
mmol/l Alk Earths 2.8
It says that its about pH 7.5 but my tank water has been tested at pH 8 with just salt addition. I'm concerned it will be too hard for the plants and fish. I can get access to purified water which is like RO. Not to sure on its parameters yet but I could mix this with the tap water to make it roughly pH 7 and a good gH. This water comes from a lab, is there any way I can accurately test the gH in the lab?

Sorry this is so long. Hope you can help me!
 

VaughnH

Lifetime Charter Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 24, 2005
3,011
97
48
88
Sacramento, CA
The reason I didn't respond to this at first is that it is asking too many questions all at once. That would require writing a book to answer all of the questions and answer them well.

I suggest that you read Rex's Guide to Planted Tanks and see how many of your questions are answered by that. Then ask a much smaller number of questions where you need more clarification.

Also, you need to decide some things yourself to start with: how much time and effort you want to devote to a planted tank, for example. If you don't want to spend an hour a day doing pruning, cleaning, etc. you won't want really high light intensity. If you want to restrict your work to every weekend, for example, you could go to something like 2 watts per gallon, pressurized CO2 and relatively slow growing plants. If you want to do even less work, you will need even less light, and a non-CO2 approach would be best. Once you settle that issue the number of questions gets smaller.