I'm thinking of adding a sump to a 120G tank. Tank is not up yet, still in the planning stages. I was going to go with the this design http://www.beananimal.com/projects/silent-and-fail-safe-aquarium-overflow-system.aspx. The holes are not drilled yet.
My original objective was to have secondary filtration and as a way to inject CO2 using the Barr External Venturi and to also hide the heater. Then in another post I had (http://www.barrreport.com/showthread.php/9705-Question-about-the-External-Venturi-Rector), a member (Left C) suggested I put the Eheim Compact + Marine with needle wheel inline with my Fluval FX5. I like the idea and it seems very efficient. Would it be better to put it in the sump and inject co2 in there or is it more efficient inline with the canister? If I put it inline then I don't see much benefit in going through the trouble of drilling the tank to hide the heater and extra filtration, I might as well just add a second canister. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thank you,
Mike
My original objective was to have secondary filtration and as a way to inject CO2 using the Barr External Venturi and to also hide the heater. Then in another post I had (http://www.barrreport.com/showthread.php/9705-Question-about-the-External-Venturi-Rector), a member (Left C) suggested I put the Eheim Compact + Marine with needle wheel inline with my Fluval FX5. I like the idea and it seems very efficient. Would it be better to put it in the sump and inject co2 in there or is it more efficient inline with the canister? If I put it inline then I don't see much benefit in going through the trouble of drilling the tank to hide the heater and extra filtration, I might as well just add a second canister. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thank you,
Mike
Last edited by a moderator: