This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. We are after as many aquarium plant images that we can get, doing so will assist us in completing the aquarium plant database.

    https://barrreport.com/threads/aquatic-plant-images-wanted.14374/
    Dismiss Notice

Substrates for root feeders

Discussion in 'CO2 Enrichment' started by Henry Hatch, Aug 3, 2008.

  1. Henry Hatch

    Henry Hatch Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    11:52 AM
    A number of years ago I had the chance to visit Karen Randall's home and see her beautiful tanks. I noticed she had a number of plants growing in clay pots. She said that she used the pots with a soil substrate to grow plants that were heavy root feeders. As I recall she did not want to plant the whole tank with soil but used the pots only for certain plants. You would think the pots would be distracting, but the way she scaped the tank they looked fine. Has any one else done this ? I have to admit I have a bias against soil substrates even though I have never used one. I have heard many horror stores about this kind of substrate. The clay pot method seems like not a bad way to give it a try.

    Henry
     
  2. Gerryd

    Gerryd Plant Guru Team
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,623
    Likes Received:
    18
    Local Time:
    11:52 AM
    I know that a lot of pond owners use this method to avoid the wading/planting....

    I think the biggest issue is finding the right size pot to plant size and incorporating them into the scape.......

    Since you can fill them with whatever and then use a thin layer of heavier stones as a cover, I would think they would not be messy.
     
  3. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,657
    Likes Received:
    583
    Local Time:
    11:52 AM
    Neil Frank did this, if you move things around and do not do water column dosing,m this method works well and allows you to try out various sediments to compare with(they all leach into the water column, so keep this in mind and how that might make all of the results seem equal and how you might over come this issue).

    I've never once had any issues with so called root feeders using the water column.
    I often question the term and the notion of "preference".

    Plants do not care near as most can tell, but you might not dose routinely, so sediments are good back up in case.

    Then you see differences, but you must account for the overall nutrients, not just the ones you measure in the water column, something obvious yet overlooked.

    I can add the same amount of NO3 to the sediment and the water column and have the growth relatively the same. Several nice studies showed this and the general consensus among researchers studying plants, they are opportunistic, they will get nutrients wherever they can, this is generally also true for the terrestrial plants.


    95% of the ornamental plant production grown in the USA are fertigated(nutrient sprayed), no soil in the roots(bark and sand etc).

    Many aquatics have big roots because they do not live submersed all year long or come from high current regions where flooding is common.

    Anubias, swords, Crypts, Crinums(some) all fall into this in/out of water group, so large roots help in that case, and from being yanked away, Crypts and swords also store large energy reserves in their roots, same for Aponogetons which are also river plants.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
Loading...

Share This Page