Hi Tom,
I'm planning to re-setup my 175 gallon planted tank and I'm wondering if I should reuse the old substrate or chuck it out. By re-setup, I mean remove everything in the tank and rescape etc.
This tank is using pond soil and has serve well for the last 2+ years. If I understand your non-CO2 method article correctly (I'll be using CO2 for this tank), I know that the soil probably ran out nutrients some 18 months ago. So should I keep this soil, or replace it?
My reasoning for keep the soil is that it has served well, the plants are healthy and if I don't redo the tank, it'll still be there anyway.
My reasoning for replacing it with new soil is to give the new setup a fresh start. It'll be a number of years before I re-do the tank again.
I do understand that once a substrate has given up it's nutrients, the tank can still go on with no problems if the plants can get it's needs from dosing the water. So I guess I just want to get your thoughts/opinions on this.
I haven't gotten NH4/Urea problems with this soil, and I've been using it for a few tanks. The packaging says it's specially prepared for pond usage and has little or zero amounts of NH4/Urea, NO3 etc.
Next question... you suggest Flourite/Onyx sand for non-CO2 tanks for the Mg, Ca and other stuff. I guess I can use it for a CO2 tank too (right?), but it's expensive to top a 175G tank with that stuff. Will a bag suffice? I'll be potting a Nuphar japonica to stop it from roaming my tank over the next few years, and I can just top that pot with Onyx sand. The pot will be easily removable, so, I can refresh the Onyx anytime.
Lastly, I'll be keeping the old gravel and going to re-use some of it (unwashed) as a layer (0.5 to 1 inch thick?) between the soil below and a fresh clean layer of gravel on top. There should be enough mulm in there to kick start the substrate, right?
Thanks.
I'm planning to re-setup my 175 gallon planted tank and I'm wondering if I should reuse the old substrate or chuck it out. By re-setup, I mean remove everything in the tank and rescape etc.
This tank is using pond soil and has serve well for the last 2+ years. If I understand your non-CO2 method article correctly (I'll be using CO2 for this tank), I know that the soil probably ran out nutrients some 18 months ago. So should I keep this soil, or replace it?
My reasoning for keep the soil is that it has served well, the plants are healthy and if I don't redo the tank, it'll still be there anyway.
My reasoning for replacing it with new soil is to give the new setup a fresh start. It'll be a number of years before I re-do the tank again.
I do understand that once a substrate has given up it's nutrients, the tank can still go on with no problems if the plants can get it's needs from dosing the water. So I guess I just want to get your thoughts/opinions on this.
I haven't gotten NH4/Urea problems with this soil, and I've been using it for a few tanks. The packaging says it's specially prepared for pond usage and has little or zero amounts of NH4/Urea, NO3 etc.
Next question... you suggest Flourite/Onyx sand for non-CO2 tanks for the Mg, Ca and other stuff. I guess I can use it for a CO2 tank too (right?), but it's expensive to top a 175G tank with that stuff. Will a bag suffice? I'll be potting a Nuphar japonica to stop it from roaming my tank over the next few years, and I can just top that pot with Onyx sand. The pot will be easily removable, so, I can refresh the Onyx anytime.
Lastly, I'll be keeping the old gravel and going to re-use some of it (unwashed) as a layer (0.5 to 1 inch thick?) between the soil below and a fresh clean layer of gravel on top. There should be enough mulm in there to kick start the substrate, right?
Thanks.