This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. We are after as many aquarium plant images that we can get, doing so will assist us in completing the aquarium plant database.

    https://barrreport.com/threads/aquatic-plant-images-wanted.14374/
    Dismiss Notice

Plants, water movement and ther sediment from Madsen et al, 2001

Discussion in 'Articles' started by Tom Barr, Oct 29, 2009.

  1. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,657
    Likes Received:
    583
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
  2. Philosophos

    Philosophos Lifetime Charter Member
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
    Not too bad of an article. I skipped over a bit on sediment since we're using a well loaded column anyhow, and tried to pay attention to the mechanical issues and growth forms.

    It seems that they're concluding that optimal growth hapens under slow, even current. This is nice to know, but I was more interested to see the modification of growth forms through moderate current. Plants seem very aware of what their leaves are doing; be it interspecies competition or water flow. Based on this study I'm beginning to think that a low, even current at the substrate is ideal, with higher current slightly above to encourage compact growth.

    Still, this does not seem to be th exclusive cause of compact growth; I have found for my personal experience that compact growth can happen with low current, under low light. Hopefully when my 48 gal gets filled, I will be able to test a tank out with higher current and lower light. If all goes well I'll have 3-4 tanks with the same dosing method and substrate with various lighting, current and CO2.

    Thanks for a link to another good paper, Tom.

    -Philosophos
     
  3. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,657
    Likes Received:
    583
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
    For example, I have Blyxa japonica growing in a lower flow region, and one where there is stronger downwelling current.

    There is a huge difference in morphology, rates of growth and appearances.
    The higher flow rates suppress growth even though the light is more intense, good CO2/same sediment and water column nutrients. Color is different also.

    While light is some of it, I placed the same plant in the same tank over where there is less flow, it reverted back to the form in the other tank.

    I like the slower and lower growing less weedy growth.
    For some species, the effect of current is very pronounced.

    While I have 3500GPH of flow in the 180 Gal tank, it's low pressure even high flow, much like the flows one might find in a moderately flowing 0.5-1 knot stream.

    The plants grow really large in that tank.
    In the other tank there's a high pressure of flow in one corner and the plants do very well there, but tend to stay small/short. I think higher flows cause the plants to grow more roots and more prostrate along the sediment instead of up/more leaves. They'd just lose the leaves and have them stripped off if they did not modify their growth forms for current.

    Most all swords/Crypts and Anubias are river/stream plants, so this is why they have strong roots and storage, not solely because they prefer root uptake. They have little choice as to sediment uptake when the dry season starts also.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
  4. dutchy

    dutchy Plant Guru Team
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    1
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
    Nice paper. But what got my attention was this:

    "Physiological studies have shown that photosynthetic
    rates of freshwater macrophytes are positively
    correlated with current velocity at low levels
    (0–0.10 m s−1), the range likely to occur within
    dense macrophyte beds"

    And this:

    "In experiments conducted at
    concentrations of CO2 and oxygen expected to saturate
    photosynthesis and dark respiration, Madsen et
    al. (1993) showed that net photosynthesis of eight
    freshwater macrophyte species decreased as current
    velocity increased from 0.01 to 0.086 m s−1. "

    So low flow has positive effects on photosynthesis, even when in situ CO2 measurements between plantbeds show fairly low concentrations.

    Or am I missing something?
     
  5. jonny_ftm

    jonny_ftm Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    821
    Likes Received:
    1
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
    The second paragraph you mention rules out CO2 and O2 as limiting factors to be sure the flow difference is responsible of the modification of growth rate.

    The fact that important flow velocities leads to slower growth is well discribed over many books. That's why many manufactures use spray bars to avoid "cutting" flow velocities

    Personally, to get a good flow over all of my 60G, I use a high pressure/high velocity output in the right front corner, midtank to near surface, directed tangentially to front glass, bottom tank, left front corner. The intake is put in the back right corner, near bottom. That way, I see a good flow directed from left to right. I can watch the flow when I feed, seeing the flakes migration from left to right.

    The left part has a much slower flow and flakes sink vertically to bottom. I added for that a second intake, much slower than main intake, via an Y connection + tap control, in the back left corner, near bottom

    Near front glass, where flow is very strong, I only put compact crypts and swords. The only problem is that black brush algae like those high speed outlets
     
  6. DaBub

    DaBub Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    1:23 PM
    I use eductors or penductors increase current and avoid ‘laminar’ flow. The velocity is lower but the current is greater, I think that is how it goes.

    The object as my Dear Ol’ Dad explained it is to make the aquarium flow as much like a river as possible. It seems to work.
     
Loading...

Share This Page