Normally red plants supposedly cannot grow except with "high" light.
Most of the issue is not being able to compare what old advice/myths mean by "high light".
So many think it means all watt/gal advice is correct for plants.
Most books and web sites still use this watt/gal range and few bother to see how little they can use and still get good results. They merely think, like many have in the past about low PO4, or algae etc, that because they saw some correlation, it must be right.
When someone else comes along and shows that they have been able grow it at 1/2 the light wattage, or with high N, P, etc.........they waffle and start looking for excuses. They rarely just go "oh well, I was wrong, let me see why I made this risky conclusion......."
Then see if it's true etc and even if they cannot manage it, they only have to look at multiple examples to realize maybe it's their own issue, not a general relationship.
People are very very "loose" with advice about light intensity and watt/gal, but very critical and specific with nutrients. CO2 is even worse, but it starts with lighting.
Hopefully this will change over time.
We started off good in the 1980's and 1990's, then after PC's came out, things started going sour.
Regards,
Tom Barr