This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Unfortunately for Photobucket users, things have changed in a big way as of June 26th they are rolling out a $399 per year subscription fee for those who want to hotlink images from Photobucket’s servers to display elsewhere.
    This does not mean it only affects this site, It now means that billions of images across the Web now display an error message instead of the image in question. :(
    Dismiss Notice


Discussion in 'Advanced Strategies and Fertilization' started by baruch mor, Jan 23, 2005.

  1. baruch mor

    baruch mor Prolific Poster

    Jan 23, 2005
    Likes Received:
    could u please rate the micros needed in the planted tank - from the insignificant to the most important.

    thanks, baruch mor.
  2. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator Social Group Admin

    Jan 23, 2005
    Likes Received:
    Re: microelements

    Well, they are all important to some degree, but as you go down the scale of % of plant biomass of each micro nutrient, Mo is not needed much:) Wereas Fe is far more. This pattern extends to your question, in decreasing order, the relative importance and effects on plant health are noted in a similar manner.

    Light=> CO2=> NO3/NH4 => etc on down the line. See Epstien 1972 for the mineral % break down in a common terrestrail plant. While these amounts vary plant to plant, nutriental status of said plant and submersed plants are different as well, the rough ranges of relative % ratios are not too far off.
Similar Threads - microelements
  1. dkarmona

Share This Page