This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Dismiss Notice
  2. We are after as many aquarium plant images that we can get, doing so will assist us in completing the aquarium plant database.

    https://barrreport.com/threads/aquatic-plant-images-wanted.14374/
    Dismiss Notice

Idea for CO2 meter using the Drop checker+ gas phase meter

Discussion in 'CO2 Enrichment' started by Tom Barr, Dec 7, 2008.

  1. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,676
    Likes Received:
    644
    Local Time:
    6:01 PM
    I was thinking about using a CO2 gas meter to measure the CO2 gas content inside the inverted chamber like the drop checker, just larger. Place a gas analyzer probe in this, and read(you need to convert the Gas into liquid ppm- about 72:1 last I checked bubbling 1800ppm air + gas into water to get 25ppm dissolved, I could be wrong, but that seemed right back then).

    This removes one boundary layer, and it can use IR method for CO2, which does not wear out etc and can easily be calibrated. Gas detectors are pretty common for CO2 and somewhat cheap.

    Still, several hundred bucks:mad:

    Since there's the conversion, the accuracy of 50ppm in the air is about less than 1 ppm in water.

    At least this is how I think it might work.
    You still have to equilibrate the air in the drop checker with that of the water.

    There's also another neat, very accurate method I'm looking at.
    See other thread with micro probes.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
  2. VaughnH

    VaughnH Lifetime Charter Member
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,011
    Likes Received:
    89
    Local Time:
    6:01 PM
    Given the wide variation in CO2 concentration you measured with your CO2 probe, is there really a benefit to trying to measure CO2 concentration at any one spot in the tank? When that concentration can fluctuate a great deal with time, due to (??), that further reduces the value of a measurement made at one spot, unless a time averaged measurement is useful.

    If only the fish were unaffected by CO2 we could just go entirely by how it affects plant growth. Maybe we need a "canary fish", one that gets a fluorescent red spot on it's head when the CO2 level is near maximum? Surely we have a DNA researcher among our group who can whip up a few samples of such fish for us to test.;)
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice