It is common practice here in the Netherlands to use a PH controller which monitors the PH value in the aquarium. In the US and other countries it is common practice to just bubble away if i may say so.
This thread is not to discuss what is best, but more what did you do to overcome some of the questions i have.
(1) Using a PH controller:
pro: Fish can't be gassed
con: CO2 is not on 24/7, so deficiency can occur even though not in all areas of the tank.
con: PH value measured by controller is affected by other factors and buffers
(2) Using a drop checker:
pro: Stable supply of CO2, 24/7 or when the lights are on
con: The fish can be gassed if the bubble rate is to high
con: How do you cope after trimming? There is less CO2 demand so Fish are more likely to be gassed.
Well obviously i am thinking of "going bubble" and not use my PH controller anymore. How did you guys handle the last 2 cons of method 2?
This thread is not to discuss what is best, but more what did you do to overcome some of the questions i have.
(1) Using a PH controller:
pro: Fish can't be gassed
con: CO2 is not on 24/7, so deficiency can occur even though not in all areas of the tank.
con: PH value measured by controller is affected by other factors and buffers
(2) Using a drop checker:
pro: Stable supply of CO2, 24/7 or when the lights are on
con: The fish can be gassed if the bubble rate is to high
con: How do you cope after trimming? There is less CO2 demand so Fish are more likely to be gassed.
Well obviously i am thinking of "going bubble" and not use my PH controller anymore. How did you guys handle the last 2 cons of method 2?