This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Unfortunately for Photobucket users, things have changed in a big way as of June 26th they are rolling out a $399 per year subscription fee for those who want to hotlink images from Photobucket’s servers to display elsewhere.
    This does not mean it only affects this site, It now means that billions of images across the Web now display an error message instead of the image in question. :(
    https://barrreport.com/threads/attention-photobucket-users.14377/
    Dismiss Notice

EI with less than 5.5 W/gal

Discussion in 'Advanced Strategies and Fertilization' started by FrankG, Dec 28, 2005.

  1. FrankG

    FrankG Junior Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tom,

    I am not sure if this question has ever been asked and answered:

    In your EI article, you write:

    Well, what is the relationship between the dosing amounts and the light? Let's assume I have 3 W/gal PC, how would you start? Obviously, you can reduce your dosing, but how much is safe? Would you reduce the amount or the frequency?
    I played around with the amount and eventually got there. But I wonder if there is a better starting point, if you have less light.

    Thanks,
    Frank
     
  2. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator Social Group Admin

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,464
    Likes Received:
    337
    Re: EI with less than 5.5 W/gal

    Simple, you can not reduce the levels at all.

    You always desire an excess amount of CO2/nutrients at all times, not "just enough", having another 0.5ppm of PO4 or 5ppm of NO3 is not going to hurt anything in any tank.

    You can also add less slowly, say adding 3 ppm less for each 3 week peroid for NO3 til you get a negative response from the plants, this takes time though, and the needs of the plants do change as plant biomass changes and we prune it back etc.

    Main thing is to provide ample nutrients at all time, so the high light idea works, wereas trying to dial in each individual tank's uptake rates, which do change as plant species and biomass change, is a quagmire that requires a lot more testing.

    Rather than getting bogged down with the test kits, dosing, huge methods etc, simply use the plant as the test kit and slowly decrease the nutrients progressively till you get a plant response.

    This is called a phytometer, basically using the plant as test kit.

    Which is what I've one mainly all along anyway:)

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
  3. FrankG

    FrankG Junior Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: EI with less than 5.5 W/gal

    Tom,

    Not sure we are talking about the same. I do not want to reduce the levels in the water column, but with less light I would expect to need less dosing to achieve the same nutrient levels.

    Again, I do not disagree. Actually, I would even say that is the beauty of your findings and EI. But how much excess do I really need to be safe? Again, with less light I would estimate less dosing will achieve the same excess amounts of nutrients. I would not even touch the CO2.

    That is how I did it and that is how I found out that about half the amounts were about right for my tank. And I still have excess nutrients based on my TDS climbing slightly between water changes. If I had started with 2 dosings per week (instead of 3), I would have wasted less nutrients in the beginning. Not that they are that expensive, but I just don't want to go really high on my NO3, PO4, if I don't have to.

    Regards,
    Frank
     
Loading...

Share This Page