This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. We are after as many aquarium plant images that we can get, doing so will assist us in completing the aquarium plant database.

    https://barrreport.com/threads/aquatic-plant-images-wanted.14374/
    Dismiss Notice

Can someone explain the math?

Discussion in 'Advanced Strategies and Fertilization' started by aronson, Jul 9, 2005.

  1. aronson

    aronson Prolific Poster

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    After some research on these forums and help from it's members I am now dosing and water changing with wonderful results! Thank you to everyone! Thank you to Tom for hosting such a great resource.

    I can't help it... I am a measurer. Maybe it comes from my other hobby; woodworking but since receiving my Lamotte Nitrate testing kit I feel empowered. With that said I have been wondering about the results of my test kit over the past few days. Hopefully (in order to better educate me) someone can explain the math behind my NO3 readings.

    First, the particulars about my tank:

    29g, 130W CF @ 6700K for 12 hours/day, CO2 w/SMS122 and Regulator, Eheim 2213, PH: 6.9, KH: 9, GH: 17. Heavy fish load: ~20 fish and 5 shrimp and medium plant load (I think).

    My tap is pH 7.1 and NO3: 6.6. I am not sure of the K or PO4 (my PO4 test kit has yet to arrive).

    On July 7th I did a 80% water change afterwhich my Nitrate kit showed 8.8ppm. I then dosed 10ml of KNO3 using a solution that has 15g of KNO3 in 140ml of RO water.

    This morning (2 days later) the NO3 measured 30.8ppm (!). I then did a 60% water change (I am fighting a low level ich problem) which brought the reading down to 15.4ppm. Needless to say when I added ferts after the water change I did no add KNO3.

    So why did the uptake not reduce the KNO3 I dosed on the 7th? Or, am I adding too much and it did reduce it down to the 30.8? Does the fish load play some part in this as well?

    Details of my dosing regimen can be seen here if anyone is interested.

    As always, thanks in advance... :)

    Adam
     
    #1 aronson, Jul 9, 2005
  2. Greg Watson

    Greg Watson Administrator
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    Re: Can someone explain the math?

    *****IF***** as a measurer you measured correctly ... then each ml of this solution should give you an additional 0.6 ppm in a 29 gallon tank ...

    So your 10 ml should have added an additional 5 ppm to your tank ...

    Mathmatically that's not possible ...

    So one or both of two things are true.

    1. You have a measuring error somewhere.
    2. You have an additional source of Nitrate coming from somewhere.

    The additional 16 ppm (plus any uptake) is coming from either your solution or from an alternate Nitrate source. Alternate nitrate sources could be fish food, fish waste, substrate fertilizer tabs ... just a few for example.

    However, I would personally double check my test kit/dosing solution first ...

    1 ml of your solution should add about 17.33 ppm to one gallon of water ... if it were me, I'd take a gallon of RO water (test it for nitrates to make sure it reads zero) ... then add one ml of your solution, shake it up well, and then test your gallon jug of RO water ... see what your result is ... if it is anywhere close to 17, then you can reasonably assume that both your test kit and dosing solution are ok ...

    If this test works out ok ... I'd test your aquarium ... dose some amount of your solution and then test again in 30 minutes or less to see if the reading went up what you mathmatically have calculated it should ... that should eliminate time and outside sources as a source of error ...

    [P.S. You can use this jug to top off your tank, so none of it will go to waste]

    Not 16 ppm worth ...

    Greg
     
    #2 Greg Watson, Jul 10, 2005
  3. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,678
    Likes Received:
    662
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    Re: Can someone explain the math?

    Plants might not be taking up as much NO3 also.

    See about adding more CO2, if that checks out, then, check it again:)

    CO2 is 90% of the hobby for folks that use it.
    Nothing acts right without it being in a good range.

    If you like to measure, measure that.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
    #3 Tom Barr, Jul 12, 2005
  4. aronson

    aronson Prolific Poster

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    Re: Can someone explain the math?

    Tom (and Greg),

    Thanks for your responses! I am going to check my solutions as per Greg's suggestion as well.

    As opposed to measuring... is it safe to assume that at a KH of 9 and the SMS showing a pH of 6.9 I can determine my CO2 to be 34ppm? If so, can/should I push it much higher than that?

    I have found that it is difficult to push my CO2 below 6.9. Exponentially so it would seem -- my water doesn't seem to want to absorb the gas in my vortex after the pH hits 6.9. I've tried to get it to 6.8 but haven't been all that successful.

    Also, could it be that the water volume is not moving enough? There is very little movement in the tank outside the flow of my Eheim and any currents produced under the vortex.

    Thanks again for your help!

    Adam
     
    #4 aronson, Jul 12, 2005
  5. Ian H

    Ian H Guru Class Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    Re: Can someone explain the math?

    If your CO2 is at 34ppm I wouldn't bother trying to raise it further, it is fine.

    I also had a 2213 in my 29G tank and added a small powerhead that created nice water movement in the tank without disturbing the surface too much. IMO water circulation is good in a planted tank, it distributes the chemical mix quickly and evenly.

    Ian
     
    #5 Ian H, Jul 13, 2005
  6. Tom Barr

    Tom Barr Founder
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    18,678
    Likes Received:
    662
    Local Time:
    3:34 PM
    Re: Can someone explain the math?

    Probably flow related.

    The reactor I designed is better, the vortex and the PG as well as others are knock offs and they seldom use the venturi which kicks the saturation levbekls higher towards the end of the day when you need it as well as purges the O2 out of the reactor.

    Regards,
    Tom Barr
     
    #6 Tom Barr, Jul 18, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...
Similar Threads - someone explain math
  1. sayhy2mark33

    Turning off CO2 at night, could someone explain this to me?

    sayhy2mark33, Nov 23, 2007, in forum: CO2 Enrichment
    Replies:
    32
    Views:
    928
    Carissa
    Dec 16, 2007
  2. thelordofthefish

    Newbie To High Tech. Need Someone To Review My Method For Peace Of Mind Before I Start This Tank.

    thelordofthefish, Jul 6, 2018, in forum: Estimative Index
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    564
    Greggz
    Jul 12, 2018
  3. DutchMuch

    About Time Someone Made An Emersed Setup Journal!

    DutchMuch, Jul 5, 2017, in forum: Journals
    Replies:
    29
    Views:
    3,152
    jevan23
    Mar 13, 2018
  4. KyleWY

    Is someone kind enough to check my preliminary planning?

    KyleWY, Aug 4, 2014, in forum: Are you new to aquatic plants? Start here
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    138
    KyleWY
    Aug 4, 2014
  5. easttech

    Can someone help me identify potential source of problem, pictures of sword leaves

    easttech, Sep 29, 2013, in forum: General Plant Topics
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    164
    Tug
    Sep 29, 2013

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice