Hi guys
Someone I know from my blog has been testing the Estimative Index (dry ferts) and reporting algae since the start of this project.
I know that:
1) There's no correlation between nutrient levels in the water column and algae (Bachmann)
2) Liebig's law of the minimum
3) Based on the two points above + EI dry fert dosing, the cause of algae is more likely poor CO2
But how come this appears after adding the dry ferts? Does it make Liebig's law more evident? Or does it amplifies the poor CO2?
Cheers,
GillesF
Someone I know from my blog has been testing the Estimative Index (dry ferts) and reporting algae since the start of this project.
I know that:
1) There's no correlation between nutrient levels in the water column and algae (Bachmann)
2) Liebig's law of the minimum
3) Based on the two points above + EI dry fert dosing, the cause of algae is more likely poor CO2
But how come this appears after adding the dry ferts? Does it make Liebig's law more evident? Or does it amplifies the poor CO2?
Cheers,
GillesF