There are some (Amano and others) which use active carbon in the substrate for mainly 2 reasons :
1. absorbing any (hopefully all) substances that could enter the water column - tannins, pigments, organic molecules all of which can come from peat and others.
2. serving as extra space for bacterial growth, because of its big surface area.
I found a ref. in Biohome web site regarding the use of carbon in the substrate which states :
I'd appreciate any answer regarding 2 main issues :
1. The use of AC in the substrate.
2. Does AC's pore size is really too small for bacteria to settle in?
Thanks
1. absorbing any (hopefully all) substances that could enter the water column - tannins, pigments, organic molecules all of which can come from peat and others.
2. serving as extra space for bacterial growth, because of its big surface area.
I found a ref. in Biohome web site regarding the use of carbon in the substrate which states :
Carbon has an extremely high SSA but bacteria cannot take advantage of this as the pore size is too small and the porosity is too great, Void space , the physical size of the micro tunnelling, and the surface texture are extremely important to the action of the bacteria, not only the surface area.
I'd appreciate any answer regarding 2 main issues :
1. The use of AC in the substrate.
2. Does AC's pore size is really too small for bacteria to settle in?
Thanks